(I figured this from High Country News originally came from the Property and Environment Research Center, “the home of free market environmentalism,” and I wanted to make that clear.)
In much of the rural West, environmental groups have a reputation for suing to stop natural resource development. But some, like the Wyoming group, are attempting a new strategy: purchasing what they want to protect. The approach, sometimes called conservation leasing, could bolster “30 by 30,” the Biden administration’s ambitious conservation plan to conserve 30% of the nation’s lands and waters by 2030, without ending the leasing revenue that state governments have long derived from resource extraction.
The only problem: It’s often illegal.
These century-old “use it or lose it” requirements were designed to deter speculation and encourage white settlement. But today, they can bias resource management in favor of extraction.
We may have discussed this before, but not in the context of “American the Beautiful.” (Note: they seem to assume that not all federal lands would automatically qualify, and that at least those committed to energy or grazing would not.) Why not change the rules to allow non-consumptive/preservation interests to pay to prevent development (for a contractual time period that would count towards 30 x 30) on publicly owned lands? I suppose a couple of answers are that 1) they shouldn’t have to pay, and 2) that money could be better used for something else. But would just removing the legal barriers to allow that option to be considered in lieu of energy or grazing for areas where environmental protection is more valuable be that bad of a thing?
Turner Ranches, American Prairie and others are already doing this, right?
If Jon doesn’t know we could ask the PERC folks.
I understand that Turner and APR are conserving private lands, and mostly by purchase. American Prairie is negotiating grazing leases for bison on BLM lands, which I suppose could be considered a “conservation” lease.
Or people could pay to not have wind or solar leases? Or outfitter guides, or ski areas? Just thinking more broadly..