FWIW I think it’s pronounced C Flurp with the accent on the C, but I could be wrong.. if so, please let me know in comments.
***********************
The USDA Forest Service has announced a call for nominations for individuals to serve on the CFLRP Federal Advisory Committee, charged with evaluating CFLRP proposals and providing recommendations to the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture on proposal selection. Please see the Federal Register Notice for process and submission details – the announcement was posted on February 3 and will be open for 30 days.
Congress created CFLRP in 2009 to invest in landscape-scale restoration to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire, enhance forest health, and support rural economies. CFLRP project proposals are developed collaboratively with USDA Forest Service staff and partners and are selected through a competitive process. Program funding supports up to 50% of the costs of implementing and monitoring the proposal on National Forest System lands.
What does the CFLRP Advisory Committee do?
- The purpose of the Committee is to evaluate, support, and provide recommendations on each nominated CFLRP project to the Secretary of Agriculture for final selections. It is solely advisory in nature.
- To this end, the advisory Committee is required to meet annually and may meet as often as is necessary to review and evaluate CFLRP proposals and make recommendations.
Who can serve on CFLRP Advisory Committee?
- The Committee consists of officials from academia; tribal, state, county, or similar agencies; non-government organizations; and related industries. Committee membership is fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented.
- Committee members will be appointed based on their expertise and knowledge in the following areas:
- Ecological restoration,
- Fire ecology,
- Fire management,
- Rural economic development,
- Strategies for ecological adaptation to climate change,
- Fish and wildlife ecology, and/or
- Woody biomass and small-diameter tree utilization
Equal opportunity practices, in line with USDA policies, will be followed. Individuals who may be directly involved in developing a future CFLRP proposal are advised not to apply due to potential conflicts of interest.
What else do I need to know?
- Committee members will be selected by the Secretary of Agriculture.
- Members serve without compensation, but with reimbursement of travel expenses for any in-person travel.
- Committee members will be subject to appropriate conflict of interest statutes and standards of ethical conduct as well as a Financial Disclosure Report.
- This Committee will expire in 2 years from the date of filing unless renewed.
- Please see the CFLRP Advisory Committee webpage for additional details, including current Committee members.
How can I apply?
- Please submit your application as outlined in the Federal Register announcement.
Application packets and any additional questions may be emailed to Lindsay Buchanan, CFLR Program Coordinator at [email protected].
If CFLRP was charged with landscape restoration following a fire in 2009, then they have been a complete failure in western Oregon and northern California, where things have only become far worse on federal lands in the past 13 years.
Do they have a single accomplishment for that area in that time? What was it (them?) and at what cost to taxpayers? My thought is that we need a lot more experienced forest managers able to make credible decisions on these lands, and a whole lot fewer bureaucrats. How does that compare with actual history?
Bob, here’s a map for CFLRP projects, it doesn’t look like there is one there.
https://usfs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=135a44ca6b2540f5a859281d4c03296b
I also think that CFLRPs develop their own monitoring plans and that there might be some standardized measures of success across CFLRPs? Hopefully someone in the TSW community knows more.
The 10-year report to Congress has lots of info on cumulative CFLRP accomplishments from 2009-2019: https://www.fs.fed.us/restoration/documents/cflrp/REF_Report-CollaborativeForestLandscapeRestoration-508.pdf
Thanks, A!
Thanks Sharon: Looks like you’re right. I’m guessing there was a good reason to avoid some of the largest, most productive, and flammable forests in public ownership. But at least there are no failures to point to!