Under Fire: The Escalating Crises Of USFS Fire Policy In The West

Thanks to Dana Tibbitts for submitting this op-ed, printed in the Nevada Globe.

OPINION–Under Fire: The Escalating Crises Of USFS Fire Policy In The West

Apparently, insurance companies are more risk averse than federal fire fighting agencies

By Dana Tibbitts, July 12, 2024 11:17 am

Through the opening salvo of another red hot fire season, another cloud of calamity is rearing its ugly head: insurance companies running for the door, dropping policyholders like hot potatoes, doubling down on already skyrocketing insurance rates, and refusing new customer coverage plans like there’s no tomorrow.

For many of these providers, there is no tomorrow in the West. What kind of insurance company can operate in states staggering under rampant wildfire operations, where firefighting agencies have been given broad license to burn and destroy with impunity millions of acres of forest, rangelands, ranches, homes and properties?

“Consecutive years of wildfire losses and increasing number of acres burned across the state have challenged our view of risk and require us to implement adjustments to allow us to be viable in the market,” Travelers Insurance reported in a recent filing in California. “It is critical to the success of our business that we reduce our exposure to wildfire catastrophic losses.”

Not only are extreme wildfire risks unsustainable for insurance providers, but what about the rest of us trying to cope with catastrophic fire activity year after year, hazardous smoke and air quality conditions, evacuation, economic collapse, and failed insurance safeguards?

We’re about to find out.

State Farm has just delivered a brutal ultimatumAuthorize another massive round of rate increases or we’re out. This second round of on-demand rate hikes this year—30 percent for homeowner policies, 52 percent for renters, and 36 percent for condominium owners—has millions of shell-shocked residents in California and Nevada over a barrel and legislators running for cover.

Screenshot of news report on Caldor Fire (Photo: Flickr)

At a recent standing room only Town Hall in Incline Village, Nevada, a crowd of concerned citizens facing massive increases in HOA fees and coverage implosion were hopeful to hear what assurances Nevada Insurance Commissioner Scott Kipper might offer. His bottom line to concerned residents: Expect nothing before 2027.

Kipper also pointed out that Nevada law allows companies to not renew policies if the risks are too great. So this new “no policy–no mortgage” reality sets up a stalemate for residents suddenly confronted with no coverage or property marketing options. Nor are there concessions for homeowners following the rules for defensible space.

North Lake Tahoe Fire Chief Ryan Sommers was more optimistic, applauding citizens for coming together as a united front. “When we all stand together against insurance companies, public agencies and government officials, we will see results.”

We’re told that this is all because of climate change, as if repeating it often enough makes it true. It is not. Nor is the wildfire crisis rooted in “a hundred years of fire suppression” as pro-burn environmental groups and the fire lobby organizations like to claim. Instead, they pressure the USFS to increase the use of long running beneficial fire for greater forest resilience and a fire-adapted West—over and against the risk of ever more intense and devastating fires.

Apparently, insurance companies are more risk averse than federal fire fighting agencies.

Out of control fires are the new norm, not because of climate change, but because of signed agreements between USFS, state governors, and other public-private partnerships, given broad license to burn as the most efficient way to meet shared objectives.

These Memorandums of Understanding (MOUsdirect the Forest Service and their “partners” to burn or “treat” a million acres of forest landscape every year. The more they burn, the more they earn—claiming critical reimbursements from Congress for acres burned as well as acres “restored.” Same in Nevada where USFS’ Let burn policy allowed a small, slow, early fire to ultimately destroy 68,000 acres with fire crews on standby, 48,000 of which were claimed as “restored” for additional funds. Ask the fire victims of Tamarack how that restoration project is going.

What is more dangerous than fire allowed to burn for weeks and months on end without putting it out, all under the guise of “beneficial” fire? There is no managing a fire that has been allowed or enabled to grow to stage four.

USFS Fire Chief Randy Moore. (Photo: USFS)

USFS Chief Randy Moore’s disastrous fire aggressions and unauthorized activity to grow fires willy-nilly on public lands is a standing feature of his annual letter of intent. Considering the USFS incomprehensible failure to “first, put out the fire” and their infringement on constitutional due process, USFS modus operandi is a clear travesty against the people warranting public scrutiny at the very least, and legal action to reform bad policy at best.

Given present challenges, the National Wildfire Institute (NWI) has taken a strong stance against fighting fire with more fire.  The organization of mostly retired USFS leadership, which does not support managed burns, says such tactics are neither safe nor effective. The most effective way to deal with unplanned fire is this: First, put it out! 

“Our federally controlled lands are at an all-time disarray as a result of 40 years of dismal Forest Service leadership,” one NWI member explains. “As a result, we have a backlog of hazardous fuel conditions on public lands that have been neglected for three or four decades, and land management agencies don’t want to admit it or acknowledge that their tactics help create this debacle. If we don’t make major changes soon, the “let burn” and “managed fire” policy will convert our forests to highly flammable brush and weedy invasive species in a very short time. We must move quickly to bring sanity to this explosive scenario—”First, put out the FIRE!”

“The out-of-control USFS policy of growing fires to ‘restore fire to fire depleted ecosystems’ often results in firestorms and burned acres far beyond anything previously recorded in California and across the eleven Western States,” says Wildfire Pro’s chief forester Frank Carroll. “The tragic effects of these ongoing, intentional burn operations – month after month, year after year – result in far-reaching damage to our air quality, water and watershed environments, life-sustaining habitats, and wildlife. Government agencies setting intentional fires in our pristine forest lands is among the greatest tragedies and on-going threats of our time.”

Make no mistake – the West is under fire and insurance companies are in a state of collapse. However, the cornerstone of this twin crisis is the same: the USFS disastrous fire policy and practice in recent decades is terrorizing millions of Americans who are left to wonder—What ever happened to our most trusted institutions? And, why can’t they just put out the fire?

Dana Tibbitts began her career as a writer and media relations professional at UCLA and continued to work in higher education, media and the arts for much of the next 30 years. She has authored several books, including the highly acclaimed biography, Harnessing the Sky: Frederick “Trap” Trapnell, the U.S. Navy’s Aviation Pioneer, published by the Naval Institute Press. Dana and her husband have lived in Lake Tahoe for 13 years.

13 thoughts on “Under Fire: The Escalating Crises Of USFS Fire Policy In The West”

  1. The return of FRCC to fire management courtesy of the BIL and IRA will not help the situation that is described in this op-ed either – that just increases the emphasis on burning more acres to “restore” areas that have “missed fire cycles”, regardless of what the outcome is on the ground.

    Reply
    • “Fire cycles” don’t exist in nature. They were invented in the 1980s or early 90s by “forest ecologists” because they are very easy (cheap/desk job) to model. Nature isn’t a cuckoo clock, and yet academics and agencies continue to use this concept as if it reflects reality. Then they cash their paychecks while our forests burn.

      The State of Oregon is currently using an out-dated forest cycle model to justify a recent tree-ring “history” of the Elliott that was throughly disproved with a public report that clearly presented the Elliott’s actual fire history in 1993. And was then purposefully suppressed. Your tax dollars at work.

      Reply
      • Hey , i was sayind desk jobbers, professors are making mony advocating that you prevent the forest from catching fire by burning it…That was two summers ago after the Hermits Peak.- Calf Canyon precription burn.started in the windiest time of year in New Mexico. I was driving around worrying the forest was about to just up and die it was so dry!..USFS came out of their offices and set 330,000 acres afire…Good job Mr. Randy Moore! That failed leadership needs to be removed and replaced with a back to nature theory.. USFS employees are driving around in 90,000 trucks with what purpose? Their comfort, life is good..the entire burecratic / corporate system as run amuck in so many $$$ ways.. About right here when i last wrote about this some buttered and bred bureaucrat or? , called me a tin foil talker….for all we know there could be someone in high places purposefully out to destroy the USA. I recalled my feelings decades ago , and recalled such a few days ago when i had to restore an old griwth treed ground area where a tenant had gone and removed all humus top soil down to bare brown clay..for decades what were probly logging companies have allowed to harvest not only the logs but the forest floor mulch that would nuture regeneraye the next crop of trees- put in.cubic ft bags stacked at your local nursery for sale..take the trees take the forest floor and seedlings a forest has been.raped , plundered and pillaged…just one aspect of alot of stupid decisions…but it is the fault of these bureaucratic employees..they came out of their office life and set the forest on fire because they had no idea what conditions existed..stupid and uncaring- yes focused on cashing the next pay check..whats a rx burn college proffesor make? $100,000.00! Whats Randy Moore making $200,000? ..We dont need these people, they dont help…they talk!
        Its even worse than you.know…its sacriligious of nature to set the forest afire..the follow indian tradition is nonsense too..they came up with that theory when all there existed in tools was fire..get out there and plant, mechanically thin and log the overgrown no rx fires and while the USFS catches up in the entire century whatever fires do occur will be less than this crap going on like a religion. Have a nice day..Cover your homes exterior with old fashion stone and cement board and metal roof and your home might survive a fire..but thats laboriius like getting out from behind the desk and into the woods where the work succeeds.

        Reply
  2. Front Range Community College — at least that’s what Google gave me in response to “FRCC wildfire”, It seems likely correct.

    Reply
  3. With more than 3/4 of fires being human caused we absolutely MUST be closing FS roads and recreation facilities as conditions dry. Billions will be saved each year. Yes, it’s really THAT simple.

    Reply
    • I agree – I remember that the Forest Service closed the woods during extreme fire danger in the 1980s – and those of us who were not on fire assignments were sent out to patrol for fires. These days it seems like people can’t believe we used to do that and don’t even think of it as an option. If the power companies are doing power shutdowns for fire danger, the public lands should also be closed at the same time.

      Reply
    • Uh, no; when conditions warrant, the FS will close the forest. It starts with campfires in rings only for stage I, no fires or welding for stage II and closures (with exceptions) for stage III. In some places, the “A,B, C D, and F” are used; F is full closure.

      The latest fire in Colorado High Country was started by non-motorized (hiker) user, so roads really have little or no effect except for easier fire suppression!

      I didn’t follow up much but the term “FRCC” came out of the 2000 National Fire Plan. The term is still widely used today to identify “departure” from what it should be – a forest, that is….

      Reply
  4. “Out of control fires are the new norm, not because of climate change, but because of signed agreements between USFS, state governors, and other public-private partnerships, given broad license to burn as the most efficient way to meet shared objectives.”

    You always want to find a cause where the fix isn’t something you don’t like. Moving out of Lake Tahoe would solve this author’s insurance problem. But does anyone know what proportion of damage to infrastructure is the result of fires that were “allowed to burn?”

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Discover more from The Smokey Wire : National Forest News and Views

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading