Bill to open Wilderness areas to mountain bikes – and chainsaws – introduced in Senate

The following press release is from Wilderness Watch. – mk


New Legislation is an Assault on the Very Idea of Wilderness and the Values of the Wilderness Act

The Sustainable Trails Coalition is attempting to amend and weaken the Wilderness Act

MISSOULA, MONTANA – Last week Utah Republican Senators Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee introduced the so-called “Human-Powered Travel in Wilderness Act,” a piece of legislation that would ride rough-shod over the Wilderness Act of 1964 by opening up America’s National Wilderness Preservation System to mountain bikes and other machines. The bill would also allow chainsaws and wheeled devices like carts and wheelbarrows in Wilderness.

For over 50 years the Wilderness Act has protected wilderness areas designated by Congress from mechanization and mechanical transport, even if no motors were involved with such activities. This has meant, as Congress intended, that Wilderness has been kept free from cars, trucks, ATVs, snowmobiles, bicycles, and all other types of motorized and mechanized transport.

“We see this for what it is—an assault on the very idea of Wilderness and the values of the Wilderness Act. Make no mistake, the goals of the Sustainable Trails Coalition are one of the biggest threats to the National Wilderness Preservation System,” said George Nickas, executive director of Wilderness Watch. “At a time when wilderness and wildlife are under increasing pressures from increasing populations, growing mechanization, and a rapidly changing climate, the last thing Wilderness needs is to be invaded by mountain bikes and other machines. “

It’s noteworthy that the Sustainable Trails Coalition had to enlist the help of some of the most anti-environmental and anti-wilderness members of Congress to carry their legislation. According to the League of Conservation Voters (LCV), Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator Mike Lee each have a lifetime environmental voting score of just 10 percent, while the most recent LCV scorecard gave Senator Hatch a zero percent and Senator Lee four percent.

Earlier this year, over 110 conservation and Wilderness organizations from across America wrote all members of Congress urging them to oppose attempts to amend and weaken the Wilderness Act and Wilderness protections by allowing bicycles in designated Wilderness. A copy of that letter is here: http://bit.ly/1VFoL1U

In the letter, the groups wrote: “These mountain bikers erroneously claim that mountain bikes were allowed in Wilderness until 1984, but then banned administratively by the U.S. Forest Service. This claim is simply not true.”

“Mountain bikes are exactly the kind of mechanical devices and mechanical transport that Congress intended to keep out of Wilderness in passing the Wilderness Act.  Bikes have their place, but that place is not inside Wilderness areas,” explained Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director of Wilderness Watch.

“We believe that this protection has served our nation well, and that the ‘benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness’ would be forever lost by allowing mechanized transport and other machines in these areas.”

# # #

4 Comments

  1. I’d give this a snowballs chance in hell of ever getting anywhere, simply by reason of the fact that it is backed by Hatch and Lee. And who is behind this “Sustainable Trails Alliance” Matt? Is this just another euphemistically named conservative scheme, or are they a legit non-profit that sold their soul?

    • Less than a snowball’s chance. FWIW, here is the text of the proposed Act: https://www.scribd.com/document/318327054/Human-Powered-Travel-in-Wilderness-Areas-Act#from_embed

      On the upside, it gives local managers discretion in whether and where to allow bikes. However, by establishing a 2-year deadline after which all wilderness will be opened up if not specifically excluded, they make this a non-starter.

      What I would like to see is a bill which leaves current wilderness as is, but gives flexibility to potentially allow bicycles in future wilderness designations. Without this flexibility, bikers will understandably fight any new wilderness proposal. Better to have allies than adversaries, IMO.

      As to the last part, allowing federal employees to use chainsaws and carts to maintain and improve trails, I don’t have a problem provided trail crews do it wisely.

  2. I know this sounds like a travesty but it already happens. When it was decided you can make “wilderness” out any place, whether it has roads or not, or has been logged or not, or whatever, you run into these problems. I know of heavy equipment being allowed in the “wilderness” to remove roads and culverts. It is really a bad idea to allow chainsaws during fires, intentional, or not?
    Maybe a wheelbarrow cart to make a trail better?

  3. Just picture hiking up a peaceful trail, when suddenly a couple of mountain bikers come barreling down the trail at 25mph or faster as you dive for cover. Now that’s a wilderness experience! Try hiking in areas already in co-existence with mountain bikes……. wheeled carts are a different story, should be non-motorized, none mechanical propelled items. If you want wilderness then get the full experience, if you want a recreational playground there’s lots of public ground that is open to mechanical, motorized equipment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *