Schott Resigns from Southern Oregon Forest Restoration Collaborative

A reader submitted this editorial in the Albany (Oregon) Democrat-Herald, which I think it an interesting bookend to the discussion about local wood below. So Santa Cruz-ites are finding a middle ground, where the sector has NOT been important, but where it has been important, in Southern Oregon, they cannot find common ground. Hypotheses anyone? I wish the People’s Research Fund could fund social scientists to survey folks across the west on some of their deeper values around this.

The story involved the Southern Oregon Forest Restoration Collaborative, a local effort which has been working to reach a common ground on ecological issues and reforestation.

But the effort has hit a bump: The only representative of the timber industry in the group, Dave Schott, has resigned. In explaining the reasons for his resignation, Schott said that in his view, the group has been overly focused on the priorities of environmentalists and has failed to take into account the needs of the logging industry.

The director of the collaborative called Schott’s decision “short-sighted,” according to a story about the dustup in the Medford Mail-Tribune newspaper.

And that short-sighted assessment would seem justified, except for one thing:

Schott had spent eight years on the board.

Eight years.

Now, maybe the better part of a decade doesn’t amount to a lot of time in the effort to change the policies that have led to generations of gridlock over our forests.

But surely it’s not too much to hope that one would have seen some progress in those eight years toward resolving the issues that have devastated our rural communities — and threatened the health of our forests, as witnessed by this summer’s busy wildfire season.

When the group initially formed, the collaborative agreed to base its work on a three-pronged approach that included economic, environmental and social considerations, said Schott, executive vice president of the Southern Oregon Timber Industries Association. But, he said, as the years went on, the economic prong of the equation kept getting short shrift.

No one thinks that logging levels ever will return to the levels of the 1950s and 1960s. And no one is advocating anything like widespread clearcuts or the elimination of old-growth stands.

But there is a place for logging as we work to reboot our rural economies, an important place. The idea that we should simply declare our public forests off-limits not only jeopardizes the health of our forests but makes it difficult to move toward any of kind of compromise.

And it also means there isn’t any way to compromise. As one player in this drama noted, “Special interest groups are hard to bring to the middle, no matter how big that middle may be.“

The result? Years go by, and little happens — except people who started a good-faith effort to locate some common ground increasingly despair of finding it.

Maybe the efforts currently running through Congress — in discussions led by members of Oregon’s delegation — finally will make some progress.

But there is a sense that time is running out.

“This is coming to a head,” Schott said of the debate. “People are realizing something has to be done. We can’t keep kicking the can down the road.” (mm)

4 thoughts on “Schott Resigns from Southern Oregon Forest Restoration Collaborative”

  1. Well…I guess we tried the “collaborative approach” and “finding common ground” to end the log jam. So much for that. Now what?

  2. This is not unusual. I’ve seen the industry make an honest effort many a time only to find out that it was a wasted effort. I once was in an audience at a local university where a USFW employee that we had worked with was giving a talk on local environmental issues. He started to go negative and I could see that he was about to denounce my company. I shook my head left to right and he got the message that if he went there I was going to be able to refute those statements very easily. He backed down but I got a clear understanding of what he said when there wasn’t a fact checker around.

    This will all be resolved when the fruits of bad science and speculation are so obvious that no one will listen to them anymore. Unfortunately, the longer it takes for people to open their eyes and admit their failures, the longer it will take to recover and bring about the healing and sound forest management necessary to minimize future failures.

  3. The problem is that the timber industry is in denial about the fact that there’s excess milling infrastructure in southern Oregon. A few more mills need to close. It’s a painful but necessary process. The NWFP gave a “soft landing” to the mills that depend public old growth. Now it’s time to stop logging large and old trees on public lands and focus on restoration, including thinning the backlog of young plantations (hundreds of thousands of acres of which are still coming online). The mills that have refused to retool, or buy land and grow their own large trees, need to go away.


Leave a Comment

Discover more from The Smokey Wire : National Forest News and Views

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading