Post-Election Thoughts About Our Forests?

With a new Republican President and a Republican-controlled Congress, how will this affect the Forest Service and the BLM?

crown-fire-panorama-web

Regarding the picture: I did some processing with a High Dynamic Range (HDR) program to get this artsy view. It is interesting that it enhanced the flames better than in the original scan, from a Kodachrome slide. I shot this while filling in on an engine, on the Lassen NF, back in 1988.

Places Worth Protecting

Twin Lakes, near Bridgeport, California, hasn’t been intensely developed, solely because of its remote location. There are clusters of private cabins. The terrain would make for an outrageous ski area but, it is too far out of the way to be successful. So, the best use of this land is to preserve it.

p9252095_tonemapped-web

My Instagram: www.instagram.com/larryharrellfotoware/

Hunting Season

This curious deer climbed to the top of the cliffs I was on, just to find out what was making the noise. As he came into view, I turned to see him scampering away, into the morning sun. Somehow, I got him to stop and pose for me, by making a little squeaky noise. I couldn’t see a thing but, I took the picture, anyway. Good luck, hunters!

I do have a new Instagram account at http://www.instagram.com/larryharrellfotoware/ Enjoy!

deer-hdr-idaho-web

Watchdog: Forest Service mismanaging forest fire risk

“The Forest Service also seemed to be guilty of double and sometimes triple-counting the amount of land it treated without making that clear in reports to Congress.”

zoom-fire-web

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/watchdog-forest-service-mismanaging-forest-fire-risk/article/2600573

According to the Aug. 16 report, the inspector general said the Forest Service has no consistent process for identifying where wildfire fuel should be removed, doesn’t use science-based risk assessment to pick projects and doesn’t accurately report data on the work it does.

As forest fires burn in western states, it’s clear that the Forest Service isn’t making the most of its limited budget to protect against wildfires, the report states. Just five of the 154 national forests had risk-assessment processes being developed or in place to figure out how to prioritize projects.

I’ve often suspected that this was done! In some areas, the USFS appears to be a “rogue” Agency, hiding the bad stuff that they do. No wonder the eco-groups don’t trust the Forest Service, eh?

Unfair Forest Service Hiring Practices: The Continuing Saga

Added to all the other ones! Here is the whole shameful story!

Amidst active contract negotiations, and after months of urging the U.S. Forest Service to end flawed hiring practices that limit who can apply for jobs in the Agency, NFFE Exposes Shameful Hiring Practice by the U.S. Forest Service Amidst active contract negotiations, and after months of urging the U.S. Forest Service to end flawed hiring practices that limit who can apply for jobs in the Agency, NFFE’s Forest Service Council (FSC) decided they needed to take a new approach with negotiations. On June 7, 2016, the FSC took their fight to the streets of Olympia, Wash. to conduct an informational handbilling outside of a Forest Service hiring event—one that required applicants to be physically present to apply.

At the June hiring event, the Forest Service was hiring for jobs across the country— as far away as South Dakota and Kentucky. However, to be considered for the vacant positions, applicants were required to appear and submit their applications in person in Olympia, Wash. Applicants unable to attend in person were automatically not considered for these jobs, regardless of their experience. This requirement effectively eliminated interested current Forest Service employees—many of whom have a great deal of experience and are the most qualified to fill these vacancies—that simply did not have the means or were unable to get away from their current obligations to apply for these jobs in person.

“By requiring interested applicants to appear in person, the Forest Service has effectively eliminated applicants from the rest of the country,” said Lisa Wolfe, NFFE Forest Service Council Vice President. “That is not fair to current employees or other applicants living in those areas. It also makes it impossible for the Forest Service to field the best pool of applicants. Anyone who cares about healthy forests or having an effective government workforce should want to see this hiring practice stopped immediately.”

To make matters worse, in April, Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell was asked about their practice of hiring events requiring applicants to appear in person in order to be considered for jobs in different states. Chief Tidwell assured Congress that applicants should be able to send in applications to be considered during job fairs. However, at the June hiring event, that simply was not the case. The Forest Service continued to use a closed process that eliminated from consideration some of the most qualified candidates.

“We cannot stand idly by as the Forest Service continues a hiring practice that is unfair to potential applicants, is bad for the agency, and ultimately short-changes American taxpayers,” said Wolfe. “People should not be expected to travel halfway across the country to compete for a job that pays less than 14 dollars an hour. This hiring practice is ridiculous, and it needs to stop.”

http://www.nffe.org/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/110462