Fuelbreaks or Maybe PODs? USDA Press Release on Funding for Fuelbreaks

My idea was to stand down plan revisions due to the wildfire emergency/crisis, and have each fire forest focus on a wildfire plan amendment which would figure out PODs, areas and practices for prescribed fire and wildfire use, and also be the final NEPA point for POD development and maintenance, as well as prescribed fire projects, with an EIS.  So I was hopeful that these fuel breaks are PODs.

DURANGO, CO,  –

Today, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced that the USDA is investing $63 million from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act to expand wildfire barriers, known as fuel breaks, to protect communities and firefighters across the West.

Fuel breaks slow a fire’s spread, create a safe zone for firefighters to work, and a safer place to conduct hazardous fuel reduction treatments like prescribed burns.

This new round of investments will support projects in Colorado, Montana, Oregon, South Dakota and Wyoming to improve firefighter response, protect critical infrastructure and natural resources, ensure clean drinking water, support local timber industries, enhance rural economies and create jobs.

“For nearly a decade, scientists at the USDA Forest Service and risk management experts have tested and refined building these defensible spaces before a wildfire starts,” said Secretary Vilsack. “With climate change fueling the wildfire crisis, we are investing in this work through President Biden’s Investing in America agenda on an even larger scale as one of the many actions we are taking to protect the people and communities we serve.”

These opportunities were identified through a cross-boundary process that brings together Tribes, local wildland fire managers, business owners, elected officials and scientists to plan for future fires. In addition to using the best available science about fire operations and risks to communities, ecosystems and responders, this process supports the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy as well as complementary fuels treatment efforts.

Through this planning process, the Forest Service works with local communities to identify fire barriers such as roads, rivers and other landscape features that can prevent wildfires from spreading. In 2015, scientists at the Forest Service’s Rocky Mountain Research Station began work with research universities, federal agencies, states, and independent land and resource management partners to identify these fire barriers in the development of wildfire strategies.

Reinforcing these barriers and constructing adjacent fuel breaks will help reduce the risk of high-severity wildfires in the project areas, all of which are in, or adjacent to, high-risk firesheds that are outside of the initial 21 Wildfire Crisis Strategy landscapes.

This announcement is part of President Biden’s Investing in America agenda to grow the American economy from the bottom up and the middle out by rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure, driving over $435 billion in private sector manufacturing investments, creating good-paying jobs, and building a clean energy economy to tackle the climate crisis and make our communities more resilient.

Learn more about how USDA is confronting the wildfire crisis on the Forest Service website.

*************

It seems like these might be a tool to settle down the folks who weren’t selected for the original landscapes.  Remember in various hearings, Montana and Wyoming folks felt that they weren’t getting their share.  So that all sounds good as does “the cross-boundary process”.  Does anyone know where these projects are? Is there a list?

3 thoughts on “Fuelbreaks or Maybe PODs? USDA Press Release on Funding for Fuelbreaks”

  1. I was hopeful this would at least mention forest planning/plans (and the general public): “These opportunities were identified through a cross-boundary process that brings together Tribes, local wildland fire managers, business owners, elected officials and scientists to plan for future fires.” Since we’re talking about long-term land allocation decisions.

    Reply
  2. I have not seen a list, but I did learn today that only 1 POD project was selected in Oregon and it is on the Willamette National Forest.

    Reply
  3. Hi Sharon (and Anonymous): I am currently working on an article about the 2022 Cedar Creek Fire that occurred east of Oakridge on the Willamette National Forest. According to the 2023 USDA USFS online ARCGIS report, “Cedar Creek Wildfire Incident,” a “Potential Operational Delineations (PODS) process” had developed a “reliable fuel break” far to the west of the fire, and: “While fire modeling and seasonality during the early stages of the incident did not indicate a strong likelihood that this line would be utilized, all the teams assigned continued to work on this contingency option.” https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/bd5c202464d84fff80e5271c880ca4d1

    I will be in touch with the local USFS District office this week with these following questions — but I have to admit that they haven’t been too helpful with similar questions so far — and maybe you or other TSW readers can help:

    1) What has the total federal budget been for PODS development and use by the USFS and other agencies?

    2) How many USFS and BLM people have been employed in this process, and how many are currently working on it?

    3) How much has the Willamette NF invested in PODS, in both time and resources?

    4) How much of the WNF PODS expenditures were directed toward the Cedar Creek Fire?

    5) How functional was the PODS process in relation to the Cedar Creek Fire, from August 1 to November 22?

    Any and all help with these questions is much appreciated!

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Discover more from The Smokey Wire : National Forest News and Views

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading