Here’s a link:
Two thoughts I had:
“new governance models as we adapt to delivering contracts and agreements with fewer staff.” I hope that these would included increased transparency (without FOIAing), clear accountability for deliverables (and how outputs and outcomes are monitored), and transparency about the accountability processes.
“We are offering lateral opportunities in key mission areas like minerals and geology and active management.”
When it seemed like my skills in reforestation and genetics were becoming unpopular, I shifted into R&D in the WO, and finally, NEPA, through a set of opportunities and encouragement from various folks. I think of JR especially who encouraged me to apply for the WO-NEPA job, way outside of my wheelhouse, and FN who thought my knowing about science might help. I wouldn’t be here (judge for yourself if that’s a good thing or a bad thing) except for both needing to switch based on the currents of program popularity, and to the folks who believed I could apply my skills to a different line of work. As a person whose skills were once in the “active management” camp, I’d like to put in a good word for minerals and geology for expanding one’s horizons and the opportunity to learn new things.
Here’s the Chief.
***********************
Over the past year, we have experienced transformational transition. As you likely know, our upcoming reorganization work is not just a response to USDA restructuring, it’s something Forest Service leaders and employees have known was necessary for some time. This is an effort to optimize our workforce, sharpen our focus, and address fiscal solvency issues that have persisted over the past 12 months.
Given ongoing budget constraints, the agency made hard decisions to not bring back seasonal employees, strictly limit external hiring, and significantly reduce travel. Since that time, many of our co-workers and friends have retired, accepted voluntary separation offers, or left for other positions—leaving gaps at all levels of the organization. Underlying all of this is the anticipation surrounding what our new organization will look like—a process that began during the last administration and continues today.
You know these challenges better than I. You have been experiencing this on the ground and leading from where you sit through this uncertain time. Across government and in the Forest Service, we are experiencing things we haven’t encountered in a generation or more. While we await additional details, it is more important than ever that we meet this moment and convene and engage our teams.
I’ve shared that I believe it is important to listen more than you speak. With that in mind, I want you to know that I’ve asked your leaders to convene calls and spend time with you, whether in small groups or on regional calls. As we work through this transition, I want you all to engage in dialogue to hear and share thoughts, concerns, and ideas. Create space for others to share before you respond.
It’s important to remember that it’s OK not to have all the answers—none of us do. I have asked your leaders to provide stability and compassion.
As Chief, I’ve had the privilege of meeting with many of you across the country over these past few months. Our employees are dedicated professionals, passionate about their work and our conservation mission. Many entered civil service with a clear purpose: to care for the land and serve the public good.
I believe in you, and I believe in our employees.
As I said earlier, our upcoming reorganization work is an effort to optimize our workforce, sharpen our focus, and address fiscal solvency issues that have persisted over the past 12 months or more. What we do to move forward within that new structure is up to us.
As we navigate this time, I ask you to think about how we chart a course through the next chapter of our agency together.
Next steps
In the coming weeks, we may have more information about our organizational structure. In the interim, we are testing new governance models as we adapt to delivering contracts and agreements with fewer staff. We are implementing interim measures to maintain our readiness and deliver priority work around safety, communication, fire suppression, active management, minerals and energy development, and public access. We are offering lateral opportunities in key mission areas like minerals and geology and active management.
I ask you to stand ready to support this effort. Be ready to provide feedback, engage on transition teams, and lead discussions that acknowledge and carry forward the success of our organization.
We are living and leading in a truly historic moment. Years from now, I want us to look back and say we rose to the occasion together. That we navigated this transition while continuing to serve the American people in new, more effective ways.
This time represents both the ending of many things we have held close and the start of a new chapter in our agency. We will lead this work together and rebuild a cohesive, dynamic organization. Thank you for everything you bring to this work, and for your service, as we shape the next chapter of the Forest Service.
“We’ll see what happens…”
Sounds promising; it looks like exciting times ahead to meet the new challenges that lie ahead! Wish I was still employed in the outfit….
The outfit has authorities for re-employed annuitants and ACES, so there’s that.
The words sound solid. Yet, I am afraid. Afraid because of my mistrust in the current Administration. I know I am not supposed to say this. Yet, thankfully, our United States Constitution still allows this to take place.
As I have noted before, I worked for 5 Administrations when I was in federal government service, 3 R’s and 2 D’s, and was proud of it. This Administration is unlike anything that I am remotely experienced in or aware of. Accordingly, at this point in time, with great sadness I shall say, “America’s Chief Forester is no longer the plenipotentiary for the Forest Service.” So, I do not know who is talking and who is pulling the proverbial strings. Yes, I wanted to say “leading.” But “leadership”, as I was taught, seems to be bygone now. I want to have faith. But the difference in what I see now and what I have known to be situationally effective leadership in the past, are so extremely different. One style produces results while truly respecting the people who serve and being kind to those that are served. The other method feels punitive to both ends. I am very proud to say that is my almost five decades of service, the United States Forest Service exhibited, for the most part, the former style — respectful, kind and productive actions. Yes, it has become a bit stale in some Misson Area actions, but its tremendous core values of being respectful, kind and productive remain. That’s a good thing.
These two sentences from Mr. Schultz are powerful: “I ask you to stand ready to support this effort. Be ready to provide feedback, engage on transition teams, and lead discussions that acknowledge and carry forward the success of our organization. And “We are living and leading in a truly historic moment. Years from now, I want us to look back and say we rose to the occasion together. That we navigated this transition while continuing to serve the American people in new, more effective ways.”
I want to believe in the results of this “transformative transition.” Let’s say that these individuals and teams come up with some really grand solutions, and knowing Forest Service employees as I do, I have little doubt this will happen. But it also seems that someone in a “DOGE-type community” can and probably will toss the plan (s), especially if it is contemporary and legacy nurturing. Will Mr. Schultz be able to stand tall and object. It’s not a rhetorical question, but I do not know the answer.
I know “time takes time” and statements of contemporary, effective and yes, needed change just may happen. It’s just when an agency that you admire so gets beat up by a slugger, it is hard to not flinch the next time when the image of change is described as a skilled pugilist.
I have my fingers crossed that the great United States Forest Service will not get slugged.
Very respectfully,
“deliver priority work around safety, communication, fire suppression, active management, minerals and energy development, and public access.”
Compare to the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act: “national forests are established and shall be administered for outdoor recreation, range, timber, watershed, and wildlife and fish purposes.”
Notably absent from the Chief’s priorities are “watershed, and wildlife and fish.” No surprise, but given the legal minimum requirements for those (unlike the “priority work” items, except maybe communication), it shouldn’t be a surprise to see lots of lawsuits.