Ownership of Uranium Mine Operations on Federal Land

I could keep going.. with strategic minerals or potash or whatever.. but I thought I finish for now with uranium. I had never heard of the federal uranium leasing program.

***************

Here’s a concrete list of the main currently operating or recently active uranium mines/projects on federal land (or involving federal mineral estate)—along with who runs them and whether they’re U.S.-owned.

I’ll separate (1) confirmed active/producing, (2) permitted/standby but ready, and (3) federal leasing tracts so you can see the real picture.


1) ACTIVE uranium mines on federal land (very small number)

Wyoming (core of U.S. production — mostly BLM land)

These are primarily in-situ recovery (ISR) operations, which are usually on federal mineral estate managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

🔹 Lost Creek ISR Project (Wyoming)

  • Operator: Ur-Energy
  • Status: Active production
  • Land: Mix of federal mineral estate + private surface
  • Ownership:
    • 🇺🇸 Public company, but Canadian-listed (foreign-controlled capital)

🔹 Smith Ranch–Highland (Wyoming)

  • Operator: Cameco
  • Status: Historically largest U.S. uranium producer (intermittent production)
  • Land: Includes federal mineral estate
  • Ownership:
    • 🇨🇦 Canadian company

🔹 Nichols Ranch ISR (Wyoming)

  • Operator: Energy Fuels
  • Status: Production-ready / intermittent
  • Land: Includes federal mineral estate
  • Ownership:
    • 🇺🇸 U.S.-based company (one of the few major domestic ones)

🔹 Ross ISR Project (Wyoming)

  • Operator: Ur-Energy
  • Status: New satellite mine feeding Lost Creek
  • Ownership: same as above (foreign-listed)

👉 Reality check:

  • These Wyoming ISR projects account for most U.S. uranium production
  • Wyoming has “almost a dozen authorized uranium mines”, but only a few are actually producing at any given time

2) PERMITTED / STANDBY mines on federal land (can restart quickly)

These matter because they’re often counted in “active operations” even when idle.

🔹 Pinyon Plain Mine (Arizona) (formerly Canyon Mine)

  • Operator: Energy Fuels
  • Land: U.S. Forest Service (federal land)
  • Status: Recently restarted production (2024–2025 timeframe)
  • Ownership: 🇺🇸 U.S.-based

🔹 La Sal / Beaver / Pandora mines (Utah–Colorado)

  • Operator: Energy Fuels
  • Land: Mix of BLM + private
  • Status: standby / intermittent
  • Ownership: 🇺🇸 U.S.

🔹 Reno Creek Project (Wyoming)

  • Operator: Peninsula Energy
  • Status: permitted ISR (restart planned)
  • Ownership: 🇦🇺 Australian company

🔹 Lance Projects (Wyoming)

  • Operator: Peninsula Energy
  • Status: restart underway
  • Ownership: 🇦🇺 foreign

👉 These “standby” mines are why counts sometimes show ~7–15 “active” operations—even though only a few are producing at once.


3) FEDERAL URANIUM LEASING PROGRAM (Colorado, etc.)

This is a special category of 100% federal land leased to companies.

  • 31 lease tracts currently exist in the program
  • ~29 are actively held by companies (not necessarily producing)

Typical operators (vary by tract):

  • Energy Fuels (U.S.)
  • Small private leaseholders
  • Exploration-stage firms

👉 Key point:

  • These are explicitly federal-owned lands leased to private companies
  • Most are not currently producing, but could be reactivated

4) Ownership breakdown (this is the important takeaway)

❗ None of these mines are “owned” by corporations in the usual sense

  • Land = U.S. federal government (BLM, Forest Service, DOE)
  • Companies = hold leases, claims, or permits

3 thoughts on “Ownership of Uranium Mine Operations on Federal Land”

  1. Ouch!

    Chat GPT is not very good for this type of query.

    I wonder what kinds of queries it is good for?

    I saw problems in the Uranium and Copper answers.

    Reply
    • Hi John, that’s one of the reasons I do this.. would like others to check with what they know in the real world, or what other AI apps say about the same thing. What problems did you see exactly?

      Reply
      • Sharon, I have been using AI on landed areas that have been untouched since the 1910 fires with screwball results. Consider this is completely out of my wheel-house as are many issues discussed on this website, but when it comes to AI – I wonder:

        “The greatest danger facing technological civilization may be not catastrophe but success–the achievement of a techno-managed world that no longer knows why or for what it exists.” William Brooks’ commentary – Frontier Centre for Public Policy, Halifax, Nova Scotia

        Reply

Leave a Comment

Discover more from The Smokey Wire : National Forest News and Views

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading